Tuesday, February 10, 2015

Fifty Shades of Stupid

Argumentum ad populum is Latin for “appeal to the people” and is an argument used by some for justifying their actions because it appeals to the masses.  Elvis famously titled one of his albums 50,000,000 Elvis Fans Can’t Be Wrong as an example of this argument. This line of thinking can have grave consequences, because although 50 million people had bought Elvis records does it really make them right? 

For those of us that have kids at some point have probably heard the argument (or made it ourselves when we were kids) “well, all my friends are doing it.”  This argument is always used by children who in their stupid kid brain know that what they are asking for is ridiculous or harmful or against a parent’s wishes.  This argument is generally a last ditch attempt to convince a parent to relent.  However, the parent’s response is almost always “well if all of your friends [enter outlandish scenario], would you do that too?” This is a classic parenting technique which then renders argumentum ad populum ineffective.   

My question is this, at what point does argumentum ad populum go from being a silly argument  which parents easily refute to valid reason for adults to act like idiots?  This Valentine’s Day the movie Fifty Shades of Grey opens up in theaters.  The movie is based on the book of the same name and is part of trilogy.  The books have sold over 100 million copies worldwide and according some cinematic prognosticators the movie will be a blockbuster. 

I cannot comment on the content of the books because I haven’t read them, but from the water-cooler talk around my workplace the story seems to be nothing short of pornography with a tad more plot.  According to the Daily Mail one fifth of the 100 minute movie is filled with sex scenes.  But it’s not just the amount of sex that is drawing criticism; it’s the nature of the sexual content.  The books/movie glorifies sadomasochism and takes the practice from the seedy underbelly of society and puts it in the mainstream.

It’s almost nauseating to think that a book of this nature has sold 100 million copies and then the movie is set to become a blockbuster.  Our society has become the preverbal frog slowing being boiled to death.  We have sat around for so long slowing accepting the perversion of sex that it has gotten to this.  When I first heard they were making the book into a movie I naively thought that it would be a direct to video release with little fanfare and no real following.  I naively thought that the American people would at some point come their senses and decry a piece of trash like this. 

Like I said, I was naïve.  Now you have sex toys being sold at Target and hotels offering Fifty Shades of Grey package deals complete with bondage accessories.  If this movie is a commercial success, which it looks to be, there are many far-reaching implications for our society.

Understandably feminist groups have rallied against this movie because they fear that glorifying S&M practices will lead to more domestic violence and women will be humiliated through domineering practices. This movie is sending mixed messages to our kids as well.  They have been inundated the past decade with anti-bullying messages.  One organization’s tag line is “Hands and Words Are Not for Hurting.”  Now, they are going to have to modify it to “Hands and Words Are Not For Hurting Unless for Bondage.” 

In the end though, this movie glorifies the idea of sex without consequence.  It takes the most intimate expression of love between a man and a woman and demeans it to an act of savagery.  At one point during the movie trailer the protagonist says to the lead female actress something like “I’m not into romance.”  What he’s basically saying is “I don’t care about you as a person, all I see you for is a vessel for me to obtain physical gratification.”

Listen, I understand that pornography is a huge business and that sex in Hollywood movies is a staple.  I also understand that movies studios try and use the ‘shock factor’ in order to sell tickets.  This movie goes beyond the simple shock and awe technique.  This movie puts abnormal sexual behavior in the forefront for everyone to see and dresses it up as acceptable, nay, desired behavior.  This movie does more than simply cross the bounds of acceptability; it redefines the bounds all the while saying “100 million fans can’t be wrong.”

Fifty Shade of [Stupidity] may not be the raunchiest movie to be shown on the big screen or perhaps not even the most perverted.  The Sundance Film Festival is a staple of low budget independent films whose themes are just as provocative, but then very few of those films ever get viewed on the Today Show with Matt Lauer.  Proof again that Hollywood is trying to bring a certain amount of glitz and glamor to sexual perversion.

The magazine covers, the talk shows, and media blitz all do one thing; erode away at the Biblical model of sexual relationships—one man, one woman within a marriage relationship.  So much of our focus has been given to homosexuality that a story of a man and woman involved in sadomasochism seems tame.  In fact it almost seems romantic because they are wrapping it in the big heart-shaped box that is Valentine’s Day. 

But mark my words; more insidious things are to come.  It won’t be long now before orgies, bestiality and even pedophilia will be dressed up and made to seem acceptable.  If you don’t believe me just ask your grandparents if Fifty Shades of Grey would be acceptable in their day.  In 50 years time our morality is almost nonexistent.  The justification to destroy morality is done with the four little words “whatever makes you happy.” 

People think that God is prude and that he limits their fun, but God created all things, including sex.  He never intended to limit our fun, but He gave boundaries to enjoy ourselves without bringing harm.  Sex does have consequences despite what Fifty Shades makes you think.  Besides STD’s there are many unintended consequences of sex; broken hearts, failed marriages, emotional disorders, eating disorders, substance abuse, rape and sexual assault, sexual exploitation, just to name a few. God doesn’t want to spare us from the momentary pleasure of sex; He just wants to spare us from the long-term unintended consequences of sex outside of marriage. 

One hundred million fans can be wrong, no matter how loud they cheer.

Leftovers, enjoy.
L. Kyle


Friday, January 9, 2015

You can't draw that!

“I believe in a God who doesn’t need heavy financing” is what Erwin M. Fletcher said in the movie Fletch Lives!  You know, I have to agree with him.  I also don’t believe in a God who is easily offended or a God who needs me to stick up for Him.  Sure, I may get a little bent when Bill Maher says that my God is ruthless, over-bearing, homicidal, and a homophobe.  I did get a little hot under the collar in college when a professor told me that a crucifix in a jar of urine was art.  I don’t like “Buddy Jesus” or Jesus Christ Superstar or assertions from Richard Dawkins that I’m diluted for believing in God.

But at the end of the day I don’t lose sleep over it. I would be lying, however, if I said that I never wanted to punch Dawkins or Maher, but given the chance I know I wouldn’t.  Even if they were in front of my house with blasphemous depictions of Jesus Christ I wouldn’t assault them.  I certainly would not go to their place of employment and mow them down with automatic weapons.

I suppose I don’t quite understand what drives a person to massacre others over a couple of cartoons. Is the god of Islam that fragile he can’t beat-up a couple of cartoonists in the streets?  The god of Islam must be so puny that he can’t take a little lampooning and his followers must murder those who make fun of him. 

Doing evil things in the name of their god is not the story here.  The story in my pea-sized brain is that people in our Government and media are hasty to distance these killers from Islam even though these criminals are more than willing to call themselves Muslims. However, they would be more than happy to associate every gun-toting, right wing wacko to the Christian faith.

It’s like our Nation has an inability to say that this has anything to do with Islam or its followers.  Howard Dean, the former presidential candidate, came out and said that the Paris attackers are not Muslim; that they were “as Muslim as he is”.  What?! Not Muslim?  Then what the heck were they? Buddhist?  Atheist?  Wiccan? Hey Howie, I’m pretty sure if you ask them they will say they are Muslim.

Two years ago Jay “the Carn” Carnie, former (half)White House press secretary, scolded the same cartoonists who were killed this week for running cartoons which might be offensive to Muslims.  What about all the other religions these cartoonists made fun of?  Did Carnie say that they shouldn’t run offensive Darwin cartoons because it might offend the Atheists?  Did Carnie warn the world that Christians would be offended at blasphemous caricatures of Jesus?  Nope he didn’t.  You know why? Because liberal America for some strange reason believes that Islam is the religion of peace and Christianity is full of trigger happy psychos.
 
On January 7, Jimmy Kimmell had Bill Maher on his program.  Bill decried the recent shooting and said that millions of Muslims supported these killings.  Mr. Kimmell tried to rebut his comment by asking “do you really think that millions of Muslims support this violence?”  What if it was some crazed gun-toting redneck from the Bible-belt who shot up a bunch of people, do you really think Kimmell would have the same rebut? Or do you think that he would agree that millions of Christians support this type of violence?

 “Darn right L. Kyle those dang Christians are always killing innocent abortion doctors and blowing up abortion clinics in the name of their God!”

I’m glad you brought that up average liberal American.  According to Salon.com since 1993 there have 17 attempted murders of doctors or staff members at clinics and eight murders.  I’m not minimizing the murder of anyone, but eight people murdered in 20+ years is a far cry from 12 people gunned down in one day.  Not only that, but not all of the people killing abortion doctors or bombing abortion clinics claim to do in the name of God. 

At the very least if Christians are killing abortion doctors they are doing in the defense of human life…not because their God was made fun of.

So why the double standard?  Why does our current culture eschew Christians and defend Muslims? 

“Because you dang Christians hate gays and hate women and don’t want nudity on television!”
Um…so do the Muslims.  Just look at Iran, Saudi Arabia and a host of other countries that follow strict Islamic laws.  Some countries put gays in prison, force women to dress in burkas and restrict media access so that they don’t see nudity and other Western culture
. 
“Well it’s because you Christians are so intolerant! Prop 8, L. Kyle, Prop 8 dang it!”
Um…I wonder if there is a Harvey Milk day in Iran? 

Look, I’m not defending all the actions of Christians in this country.  I don’t agree with or like the actions of most Televangelists or the parishioners of the Westboro Baptist Church.  But I also don’t agree with Bill Maher’s comment that “all religions are dangerous.”  People have and will forever do evil things in the name of God, Muhamad, Allah, Satan or barking dogs. 

The point is that there is a large sentiment that Christianity is bad and Islam is good despite the mass killings, bombings, and terror sprees committed by Muslims.  People always say that those people “are radical Muslims” and not all Muslims want to behead people and partake in jihad. 

The word radical means “of or going to the root or origin; fundamental.” So by the strict definition these people terrorists in Paris are Muslims.  They are going to the root or origin or fundamentals of the teachings of the Muhammad.  Muhammad taught to kill those that would not covert to Islam.  Those who don’t subscribe to this teaching are the ones in danger of not being Muslims.

On the other side though, ‘radical’ Christians are the ones truly loving people without lopping off their heads.  Radical Christians claim to love Jesus and follow His teachings. The problem with Christ’s teaching--to those who are not Christians--is that it exposes that people are in need of a Savior.  His teachings tell us to die to ourselves and put others needs above our own. In fact Jesus said that in order be a true follower of His that you need to “pick up your cross and follow Him.” He tells Christians that they will face trails and persecutions.  Shoot Jesus even knew that people would make fun of Him and us, but we need to pray for those people instead.    

Perhaps those in the media should examine side by side the teachings of Muhammad and Jesus.  They would find out that Muhammad preaches death and destruction and Jesus preaches graced and forgiveness.

Leftovers, enjoy.

L. Kyle